Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Cybertext
Aarseth E., Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1997. Type: Book (9780801855795)
Date Reviewed: Jun 1 1998

Aarseth discusses digital literature and its status in literary theory. His aim is to define a place for electronic works--hypertext, computer games, story generators, and multiuser discourses (MUDs)--within theories of literature.

This book differs from previous accounts of digital literature in that it does not try to define electronic texts as textual forms radically different from all other types of “standard” literature. (The texts examined by the author throughout the book are referred to as cybertexts, by which he means texts organized in such a way as to integrate the user, or reader, into the literary process.) Instead, the author criticizes the opposition and argues that previous attempts have focused on the medium, that is, the format of the text, rather than on the content or the interaction with the user. According to the author, electronic literature is not unique; it shares similarities and differences with other literary works, and theories should accommodate this. He states

I argue that existing literary theory is incomplete (but not irrelevant) when it comes to describing some of the phenomena studied here, and I try to show why and where a new theoretical approach is needed. My final aim is to produce a framework for a theory of cybertext or ergodic literature and to identify the key elements for this perspective (p. 17).

Aarseth considers electronic textual forms as “ergodic” literature, a term borrowed from physics “that derives from the Greek words ergon and hodos, meaning ‘work’ and ‘path’” (p. 1). He uses the term to refer to forms of literature in which the user must perform specific actions to accomplish a literary sequence.

Ergodic literature includes digital texts such as computer games, hypertext novels, story generators, and MUDs. But it also includes paper-based texts such as I Ching, a Chinese book of wisdom made up of parts that can be combined in different ways to produce up to 4,096 possible texts; Apollinaire’s Caligrammes, poems in which the words are organized in multiple directions, without a clue as to what order to read them in; and Queneau’s Cent mille millards de poèmes, a book containing 10 × 14 lines, the combination of which can produce up to 1014 sonnets. Aarseth shows that all these texts, though printed in different media, belong to the same paradigm.

Aarseth’s model of ergodic literature is supported by a typological analysis of the textual forms examined. The analysis is based on seven variables: dynamics, determinability, transiency, perspective, access, linking, and user functions. (The definitions of these variables are provided and discussed in chapter 3.) The results show that the works differ, not because of the media in which they are presented (paper or digital), but according to more fundamental characteristics, such as the level of interaction with the user.

The book consists of nine chapters, a 200-item bibliography, and an index of keywords and authors cited. Chapter 1, the introduction, presents the book’s focus and defines the main concepts and terms used. Chapter 2 discusses approaches proposed by other literary researchers (especially theoretical accounts of digital literature) and explains how Aarseth’s analysis differs from these previous approaches. It also discusses the fundamental characteristics of the texts studied, namely that they are nonlinear, interactive, “works in movement.” Chapter 3 presents the text typology developed by Aarseth and the method used to analyze ergodic texts. The method relies on a program designed by Daniel Appolon [1].

Chapters 4 through 7 are devoted to the aesthetics of specific forms of digital literature. Chapter 4 discusses hypertexts, chapter 5 discusses computer games, chapter 6 discusses story generators, and chapter 7 discusses MUDs. Chapter 8 redefines the role of the reader in cybertexts; the redefined role allows him or her to transform the text and become an active part of the literary process.

This book is clear and readable. Although it is primarily intended for literary theorists and critics, it is accessible to nonspecialists. The approach proposed by Aarseth is appealing. Some critics might argue that part of the analysis relies on a typology based on variables, and the choice of variables could be criticized. Although this is true, the basic concepts developed by Aarseth and his discussion of fundamental issues remain extremely valuable.

Reviewer:  M.-C. L'Homme Review #: CR121465 (9806-0407)
1) Appolon, D. Dataanalystiske metoder i filologigen. In Den Filologiske Vitenskap, O. E. Haugen and E. Thomassen, Eds., Solum, Oslo, 1990, 181–208.
Bookmark and Share
 
Literature (J.5 ... )
 
 
General (I.7.0 )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Literature": Date
Evolutionary trends in poetic style: the case of English metaphysical poetry
Martindale C. Computers and the Humanities 18(1): 3-21, 1984. Type: Article
Mar 1 1985
Textual analysis and synthesis by computer
Brainerd B. Abacus 4(2): 8-18, 1987. Type: Article
Oct 1 1987
Literature
Corns T. (ed), Smith M., Halsted Press, New York, NY, 1987. Type: Book (9789780470208526)
Feb 1 1988
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy