Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
From Memex to hypertext
Nyce J., Kahn P. (ed), Academic Press Prof., Inc., San Diego, CA, 1991. Type: Book (9780125232708)
Date Reviewed: May 1 1993

…we were struck by a discontinuity. People interested in hypertext, electronic libraries, and information retrieval, the very audience influenced by Memex, knew little or nothing about Bush as an engineer and pioneer of computing machines. People who knew Bush as an engineer and statesman had written little about Memex. We set out to determine what was known about Bush’s Memex, to better understand the context from which it emerged, the ideas it represented, and to evaluate the impact it has had on the computer and information sciences (p. ix).

The editors address several interesting questions in this book.

This intriguing collection of essays includes two commentaries by the editors: “A Machine for the Mind:  Vannevar  Bush’s Memex” and “The Idea of a Machine: The Later Memex Essays.” The remaining chapters are Larry Owens’s introductory piece, “Vannevar Bush and the Differential Analyzer”; seven essays by Bush, including the full text of both the Atlantic Monthly and Life versions of “As We May Think”; and eight other discussions: Colin Burke’s “A Practical View of Memex: The Career of the Rapid Selector,” Doug Engelbart’s “Letter to Vannevar Bush and Program on Human Effectiveness,” Theodor Nelson’s “As We Will Think,” Linda Smith’s “Memex as an Image of Potentiality Revisited,” Norman Meyrowitz’s “Hypertext--Does It Reduce Cholesterol, Too?” Tim Oren’s “Memex: Getting Back on the Trail,” Gregory Crane’s “Aristotle’s Library: Memex as Vision and Hypertext as Reality,” and Randall Triggs’s “From Trailblazing to Guided Tours: The Legacy of Vannevar Bush’s Vision of Hypertext Use.”

The essays address the questions stated in the introduction. Smith’s essay, which updates an earlier study she published in 1981, documents the impact, or lack thereof, of Bush’s “As We May Think” in the computer and information science literature. The essays by Owens, Kahn and Nyce, and Burke provide the context from which Memex originated. But Engelbart’s 1962 letter to Bush requesting permission to include extensive quotes from “As We May Think” in his Air Force project report (also included) on computer-based means to augment human intellect starts to explain the discontinuity. More than anyone else, except perhaps Ted Nelson, Engelbart appreciated the implications of a Memex-type approach to information handling. Yet Bush never replied to Engelbart’s letter, and Engelbart himself has never received the acknowledgment or appreciation from the information science community that his early work deserves.

The discontinuity is extended by Nelson’s claims that Bush is misunderstood--that Memex has little to do with information retrieval and that Bush rejected indexing and settled instead on “interwoven documents.” The primary reason that Memex has never been implemented, conceptually or otherwise, is not that the hardware does not exist to do it. Rather, we have not yet learned how to index so that heterogeneous sets of users can be equally well satisfied. We have not even learned how to index well enough to satisfy a homogeneous group of users without training the users in retrieval techniques and query formulation. Hypertext is one more approach to supporting user-supplied indexing via links and trails and webs. Like Bush’s associative indexing, it is a useful approach but not sufficient for all types of information retrieval. It is not the lack of a large corpus of online information but the lack of appropriate indexing for that information that causes us problems.

Triggs’s comment that we have no “large corpi of heterogeneous on-line information” (p. 364) ignores the existence of the thousands of online databases and the work being done to establish protocols for retrieval and data exchange. Even when this work is accomplished, however, the basic problem will still exist. When users can search system Y using system X’s commands, or when they can sit down at their workstations or PCs and wander through hypermedia, what they retrieve will be dependent on the underlying indexing, and we still do not know the best ways to do that. Bush’s Memex conceptualized the problem and one kind of solution--the first mechanical, personalized information system. Many other solutions have been tried since then, none of them wholly successful. The essays in this book, taken as a whole, give us a picture of why this is so.

Reviewer:  H. Burton Review #: CR116826
Bookmark and Share
Would you recommend this review?
Other reviews under "General": Date
Intelligent information processing III: IFIP TC12 International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing (IIP 2006), September 20-23, Adelaide, Australia
Shi Z., Shimohara K., Feng D., Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 2006.  580, Type: Book (9780387446394)
Aug 9 2007
Understanding movement in context with heterogeneous data
Derin O., Mitra A., Stroila M., Custers B., Meulemans W., Roeloffzen M., Verbeek K.  MOVE 2019 (Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computing with Multifaceted Movement Data, Chicago, IL, Nov 5, 2019)1-4, 2019. Type: Proceedings
Sep 22 2021
Information management
Kay M., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1993. Type: Book (9780136305002)
Sep 1 1994

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 2004™
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy