Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Predicting students’ final degree classification using an extended profile
Al-Sudani S., Palaniappan R.  Education and Information Technologies 24 (4): 2357-2369, 2019. Type: Article
Date Reviewed: Jan 21 2020

Student retention is of great concern to higher education institutions, and a higher dropout rate may be reflected in the university’s reputation. Extensive studies have attempted to identify at-risk students in an attempt to reduce student attrition as much as possible.

In an attempt to predict student performance, the authors present a predictive model based on feed-forward multilayer neural networks that includes “academic, demographic, institutional, psychological, and economic factors.” The bulk of the dataset used consisted of traditional students (18–22 years old) at a British university.

The authors carefully normalized input and output vectors. The model was implemented using MATLAB. The end-of-year results provide statistically valid results. The model reflects the United Kingdom’s educational system; it may not apply to other countries, where degrees are not classified as first or upper second. In addition, the classifiers used may not apply to nontraditional students, such as older and/or working adults, students with family members, and those who are economically independent. In these cases, the approach can be tailored to replace the classifiers with more relevant ones, for example, classifiers based on a particular degree structure.

A psychological motivation factor measured the sustained level of activity throughout the course. This is an example of a factor that may be relevant to traditional students, but not nontraditional ones. For nontraditional students, family emergencies may skew this measure at times, especially if students are single parents, for example.

Researchers interested in identifying at-risk higher education students should read this paper.

Reviewer:  Jesus Borrego Review #: CR146846 (2006-0141)
Bookmark and Share
  Reviewer Selected
 
 
General (K.3.0 )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "General": Date
Curriculum learning for speech emotion recognition from crowdsourced labels
Lotfian R., Busso C.  IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 27(4): 815-826, 2019. Type: Article
Aug 20 2021
Jupyter Notebook in CS1: an experience report
Zastre M.  WCCCE 2019 (Proceedings of the Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education, Calgary, AB, Canada,  May 3-4, 2019) 1-6, 2019. Type: Proceedings
Jun 17 2020
On the acceptance and usefulness of personalized learning objectives in MOOCs
Rohloff T., Sauer D., Meinel C.  [email protected] (Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, Chicago, IL,  Jun 24-25, 2019) 1-10, 2019. Type: Proceedings
Jun 5 2020
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright © 2000-2021 ThinkLoud, Inc.
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy